posted by
terryfrost at 10:42am on 04/09/2006
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Well, the wedding happened, and it was great. The ceremony was eclectic (as it would be with
queen_nephthys and I was the focal points), all but one of the people invited showed up (also, there was one person down with the flu) and the weather held out. We still have a shitload of wine left - which isn't a bad thing. But the best was the fun and love we go from the guests. Terrific stuff. For those of you not there, this clause is a legal requirement in Australian weddings thanks to the John Howard Social Engineering Junta.....
Terry, Sally, I am a civil celebrant authorised by the Commonwealth of Australia to solemnise marriages. Before you are joined in marriage in my presence and in the presence of these witnesses, I am to remind you of the solemn and binding nature of the relationship into which you are now about to enter. Marriage, according to law in Australia, is the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.
I read the following paragraph during the ceremony as a retort to that ugly clause.
Lyn, our celebrant, has a legal commitment to state that “Marriage, according to law in Australia, is the union of a man and a woman”. Sally, myself and Lyn all have a hope that one day that clause will be struck from the wedding vows to enable all our friends, regardless of their sexuality, to have the basic human right to be married before their friends and families. If there is one dark cloud over this ceremony, it’s the legal requirement for that phrase.
Sometimes you have to say the right thing.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Terry, Sally, I am a civil celebrant authorised by the Commonwealth of Australia to solemnise marriages. Before you are joined in marriage in my presence and in the presence of these witnesses, I am to remind you of the solemn and binding nature of the relationship into which you are now about to enter. Marriage, according to law in Australia, is the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.
I read the following paragraph during the ceremony as a retort to that ugly clause.
Lyn, our celebrant, has a legal commitment to state that “Marriage, according to law in Australia, is the union of a man and a woman”. Sally, myself and Lyn all have a hope that one day that clause will be struck from the wedding vows to enable all our friends, regardless of their sexuality, to have the basic human right to be married before their friends and families. If there is one dark cloud over this ceremony, it’s the legal requirement for that phrase.
Sometimes you have to say the right thing.
There are 9 comments on this entry. (Reply.)